Skip to main content

Key clinical features of FCS1,2

Look for these indicators of FCS in your patients:

Chart icon

Fasting triglyceride levels of ≥880 mg/dL that are refractory to standard triglyceride-lowering therapies

Document icon

No known secondary causes for their sHTG*

Pain icon

Recurrent abdominal pain or history of acute pancreatitis

If there is clinical suspicion of FCS based on these indicators, consider genetic testing to confirm the diagnosis and guide treatment decisions to help prevent further disease burden and complications such as acute pancreatitis (AP).1,3

 

*Hypertriglyceridemia can be caused by medications such as glucocorticoids, ethinyloestradiol and neuroleptics, or conditions such as uncontrolled diabetes, hypothyroidism, and pregnancy.1
FCS = familial chylomicronemia syndrome

Excluding secondary factors that may contribute to hypertriglyceridemia4

When investigating a patient for a potential diagnosis of FCS, it is crucial to first exclude secondary/environmental factors as the principal cause of hypertriglyceridemia – once these have been ruled out, the clinical suspicion can appropriately shift to a genetic disorder like FCS.3,4

It is important to note that if an FCS patient does have secondary/environmental factors (even if they are not the primary cause of their hypertriglyceridemia), these need to be managed because they can further elevate TG levels and unnecessarily increase the risk of AP.4,5

 Adolescents/adultsChildrenInfants
Lifestyle
  • High alcohol intake
  • Reduced physical activity
  • High fat or sugar intake
  • Ultraprocessed (NOVA4) food diet 
  • High fat or sugar intake
  • Ultraprocessed (NOVA4) food diet 
 
Clinical conditions
  • Autoimmune chylomicronemia  (eg, systemic lupus erythematosus, anti-lipoprotein lipase antibodies)
  • Uncontrolled diabetes type 1 or 2  (non-pancreatitis induced)
  • Endocrine causes (eg, Cushing’s syndrome, polycystic ovarian syndrome, growth hormone deficiency, acromegaly)
  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
  • Hypothyroidism
  • Metabolic syndrome
  • Rare genetic disorders (eg, glycogen storage disorders)
  • Lipodystrophies
  • Renal causes (eg, chronic renal failure, nephrotic syndrome)
  • Glycerol kinase deficiency
  • Autoantibodies against GPI-HDL binding protein 1
  • Cancer
  • Congenital nephrotic syndrome
  • Glycogen storage disease type 1
  • Hypothyroidism
  • Protein-losing enteropathy
  • Lipodystrophies
  • Glycerol kinase deficiency
  • Cancer
  • Congenital nephrotic syndrome
  • Hypothyroidism
  • Protein-losing enteropathy
  • Glycerol kinase deficiency 
Medications
  • Androgen deprivation therapy
  • Antidepressants (eg, sertraline)
  • Antiretrovirals (eg, protease inhibitors)
  • Atypical antipsychotics
  • Beta-adrenergic blocking agents
  • Bile acid binding resins
  • Diuretics
  • Estrogen, estrogen receptor agonists, estrogen receptor modulators, oral contraceptives
  • Glucocorticoids (eg, corticosteroids)
  • Immunosuppressants (eg, cyclosporine)
  • L-asparaginase
  • Propofol
  • Retinoids, retinoid X receptor agonists
  • Total parenteral nutrition
  • Total parenteral nutrition
  • Glucocorticoids  (eg, corticosteroids)
  • Chemotherapy
  • Antiretrovirals (eg, protease inhibitors)
  • Immunosuppressants (eg, cyclosporine)
  • Propofol
  • For older children:
    • Antidepressants (eg, sertraline)
    • Atypical           antipsychotics
  • Total parenteral nutrition
  • Glucocorticoids
(eg, corticosteroids)
  • Chemotherapy

Adapted from Hegele RA, Ahmad Z, Ashraf A, et al. Development and validation of clinical criteria to identify familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) in North America. J Clin Lipidol. 2025;19(1) (online-only supplementary material):83–94.

The European FCS score (‘Moulin score’) is a scoring tool for familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS)

In 2018, a panel of European experts (Moulin et al) published an algorithm-based tool using laboratory and clinical findings, which helps differentiate FCS from multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome (MCS) and identify candidates for genetic testing.1

The scoring tool below can be used to assign a clinical score for patients with chylomicronemia syndrome based on triglyceride (TG) levels, medical history and age. It was originally proposed that patients with a score equal to or above 10 (meaning FCS is very likely) should be genetically tested.1 In more recent studies, a lower European FCS score of 7 has been proposed as the referral criterion to request genetic testing for FCS confirmation.6

Using a lower threshold for early referral to genetic testing (a European FCS score of 7 or above) may allow earlier confirmation of a definitive diagnosis and initiation of appropriate treatment.3,4,6,7

Select each item that applies to determine your patient's FCS score. The numbers in brackets represent the weighting given to the presence of each characteristic.1

Clinical versus genetic diagnosis in chylomicronemia syndrome

Patients who score highly on clinical tools such as the European FCS score, but have not undergone genetic testing (or a genetic test was indeterminate), may be classified as having a ‘clinical FCS’ diagnosis.5 This classification is often used in settings where genetic testing is limited or unavailable.5

In some cases, patients with indeterminate genetic testing may be subsequently adjudicated to have genetic FCS by a subject matter expert (e.g. with the use of advanced software and additional bioinformatic evaluation).8,9 Accordingly, consider re-testing if there is a high suspicion of FCS.

References

  1. Moulin P, et al. Atherosclerosis. 2018;275:265–272.

  2. Gaudet D, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2200-2206. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1400284.

  3. Javed F, et al. J Clin Lipid. 2025;19:382–403.

  4. Hegele RA, et al. J Clin Lipidol. 2025;19(1):83–94.

  5. Saadatagah S, et al. J Clin Lipidol. 2025;19(4):723–736. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2025.03.012.

  6. Bashir B, et al. Atherosclerosis. 2024;391:117476. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2024.117476. 2024

  7. Davidson M, et al. J Clin Lipidol. 2018;12:898–907.

  8. Stroes ESG, et al. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(19):1781–1792.

  9. Stroes ESG, et al. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(19) (supplementary appendix):1781–1792.

NP-50388